<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<item xmlns="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5" itemId="1149" public="1" featured="1" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5 http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5/omeka-xml-5-0.xsd" uri="https://archives.christuniversity.in/items/show/1149?output=omeka-xml" accessDate="2026-04-08T08:52:25+00:00">
  <fileContainer>
    <file fileId="1009">
      <src>https://archives.christuniversity.in/files/original/df169de5da825ea5b18c0f8be4f537b8.pdf</src>
      <authentication>e1a0ee515ebaca0e38e7edd79abd24c8</authentication>
    </file>
  </fileContainer>
  <collection collectionId="23">
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="64989">
                <text>MPHIL</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </collection>
  <itemType itemTypeId="18">
    <name>Mphil</name>
    <description>Mphil Thesis</description>
  </itemType>
  <elementSetContainer>
    <elementSet elementSetId="1">
      <name>Dublin Core</name>
      <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="50">
          <name>Title</name>
          <description>A name given to the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="5462">
              <text>EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT IN RELATION TO ORGANIZATIONAL CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOR IN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ORGANIZATIONS</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="39">
          <name>Creator</name>
          <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="5463">
              <text>.H  Saradha</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="40">
          <name>Date</name>
          <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="5464">
              <text>2010</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="48">
          <name>Source</name>
          <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="5465">
              <text>Management</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="41">
          <name>Description</name>
          <description>An account of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="5466">
              <text>  Employee contribution becomes a critical business issue because in trying to produce superior output, companies have no choice but to try and engage not only the body but the mind and soul of every employee. Most organizations today realize that a satisfied employee is not necessarily the best employee in terms of loyalty and productivity. The best employee is really an engaged employee ?? one who is intellectually and emotionally bound with the organization, who feels passionate about its goals and is committed towards its values. This employee goes the extra mile beyond the basic job requirements.

  Currently, organizations expect their employees to be proactive and show initiative, collaborate smoothly with others, take responsibility for their own professional development,  and  to  be  committed  to  high  quality  performance  standards.  Thus employees who feel energetic and dedicated and who are absorbed by their work, employees who can create a culture in the organization that would be for the well-being of the organization and people involved in the organization are most critical for the organization.   These   voluntary   behaviors   which   contribute   to   the   business   unit performance are Organizational Citizenship Behaviors.

  Engaging  employees  of  an  organization  is  critical  to  the  organizations  success.

  Employee Engagement is often the most significant differentiator between competing IT organizations. This is true particularly for service based IT companies as revenues are directly proportional to number of engaged workforce in the organization.

  Majority of researches on employee engagement from survey houses and consultancies have established the relationship between employee engagement, financial business performance and profitability. Interestingly, there are very few academic literatures on engagement. Several literatures on OCB have highlighted the relationship between OCB and productivity, in-role performance, and business unit performance. However there has been no research established to find out if there is any relationship between employee engagement and OCB.  In this research, the researcher is interested to focus on employee engagement and OCB in Indian and multinational companies operating in the IT sector in India. The research is focused to analyze if the dimensions of OCB like helping behavior, taking initiative, self development indicate the engagement levels of an employee.

  Based  on  the  review  of  literatures  and  identified  the  gap,  the  investigator  felt  an imperative need to pursue with the current research.

  The sample consisted of 235 IT professionals from both Indian and MNC companies. The judgmental   and   convenient   sampling   technique   was   adopted   for   selecting   the respondents.

  Two standard tools were used to measure the variables of the study:-

 1.Employee Engagement  questionnaire  by  Dilys  Robinson  (2004),  the  reliability  for  the  scale was.880. 

 2.Organizational Citizenship Behavior questionnaire by Podsakoff (2000), the reliability for the scale was .703



The major findings of the study were -



i. There was a positive significant relationship  between Employee Engagement and Organizational Citizenship Behavior.

ii.The  drivers  of  engagement  viz.  pay and  benefits,  feeling  valued  and  involved, training and development, job satisfaction, management, colleagues, equal opportunities, communication, current career intention are found to have significant positive correlation with Employee Engagement.

iii.There was a significant negative relation between Employee Engagement and stress and work pressure.

iv.The variable with highest influence on engagement was current career intension, followed by job satisfaction, pay &amp;amp; benefits, management, equal opportunities, and organization citizenship behavior.

v.The variables colleagues, communication, training and development, feeling valued and  involved  were  not  found  to  have  any  significant  impact  on  Employee Engagement.

vi.      There were significant  differences  in job  satisfaction behavior  between men and women professionals. Job satisfaction was significantly higher for women than for men.

vii.There were significant differences in organizational citizenship  behavior between men and women professional. The Organizational citizenship Behavior was higher for men than women.

viii.There were significant differences in current career intension between different age groups.  Current  career  intension  was  generally  increasing  with  age,  with  the exception of the 41-45 yr. age group. There was no significant difference in other dimensions between age groups.

ix.There  was  no  significant  difference  in  any  of  the  dimensions  based  on  work experience.

x.There were significant differences in satisfaction with pay and benefits based on qualification. Satisfaction with pay and benefits was highest for professionals with PhDs, and lowest for post-graduates.

xi.Stress and work pressure was highest for graduates, and lowest for PhDs there was no significant difference in other dimensions based on qualification.

xii.There  were  significant  differences  in  Employee  Engagement  and  the  type  of companies. Employee Engagement was higher for professionals working in Multi National Companies than for those in Indian companies.

xiii.Satisfaction with management was higher for professionals working in Multi National Companies than those working in Indian companies.

xiv.Satisfaction with management was significantly higher for professionals working in Multi National Companies than those working in Indian companies.

xv.Stress and work pressure was significantly higher for professionals working in Indian companies than those working in Indian companies.

xvi.At a micro  level analysis, it was found  that type of IT company the employees belonged did not significantly differ among pay and benefits, feeling valued and involved, job satisfaction, colleagues, equal opportunities, training and development and current career intention.

xvii.It was found  that the driver qualification did  not have any significant difference among feeling valued and involved, colleagues, equal opportunities, job satisfaction training and development and management.

xviii.Gender did not significantly differ among the variables feeling valued and involved, colleagues,   equal  opportunities,training and development and current career intention, and management.

xix.It was found that age did not significantly differ among any of the dimensions like feeling valued and involved, colleagues, equal opportunities, job satisfaction training and development and management. Length of service in the organization did not significantly differ among employees in any of the dimension.

xx.It  was  found  that  there  was  no  significant  difference  between  Organizational citizenship Behavior, age of the employees, work experience of the employees, and qualification of the employees.

xxi.It  was  found  that  there  was  no  significant  difference  between  Organizational citizenship Behavior, age of the employees, work experience of the employees, and qualification of the employees.

xxii.It was found that male employees were satisfied with pay and benefits.

xxiii.Female employees were feeling more valued and involved than male employees.

xxiv.The  female  employees  were  more  satisfied  with  the  training  and  development activities.

xxv.It was found that female employees had more levels of Employee Engagement than male employees.

xxvi.It  was  found  that  female  employees  were  more  satisfied  with  management  and colleagues.

xxvii.Male employees seem to undergo more of stress and work related pressure than male employees.

xxviii.It was found that male employees were more satisfied with communication and equal opportunities.

xxix.Female  employees  had  more  intentions  to  stay  with  their  companies  than  male employees.

xxx.The level of Organizational citizenship Behavior was higher for men than women.

xxxi.Employees working in MNCs were satisfied with pay and benefits, feeling valued and involved training and development.

xxxii.Employee engagement level of MNC employees was higher than Indian employees. 

xxxiii.The stress and work pressure was higher for Indian employees than MNC employees.</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </elementSet>
  </elementSetContainer>
</item>
