<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<item xmlns="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5" itemId="1158" public="1" featured="1" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5 http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5/omeka-xml-5-0.xsd" uri="https://archives.christuniversity.in/items/show/1158?output=omeka-xml" accessDate="2026-05-18T02:27:48+00:00">
  <fileContainer>
    <file fileId="1018">
      <src>https://archives.christuniversity.in/files/original/51ff0922391838133566810d1759f406.pdf</src>
      <authentication>9a41beb8100a06715c2ed0e4b5d411c3</authentication>
    </file>
  </fileContainer>
  <collection collectionId="23">
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="64989">
                <text>MPHIL</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </collection>
  <itemType itemTypeId="18">
    <name>Mphil</name>
    <description>Mphil Thesis</description>
  </itemType>
  <elementSetContainer>
    <elementSet elementSetId="1">
      <name>Dublin Core</name>
      <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="50">
          <name>Title</name>
          <description>A name given to the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="5505">
              <text>PERCEIVED EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION IN RELATION TO RECREATIONAL FACILITIES: AN EXPLORATORY STUDY</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="39">
          <name>Creator</name>
          <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="5506">
              <text>Singh Rajender </text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="40">
          <name>Date</name>
          <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="5507">
              <text>2010</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="48">
          <name>Source</name>
          <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="5508">
              <text>Management</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="41">
          <name>Description</name>
          <description>An account of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="5509">
              <text>As the society has shifted from the industrial to the information era, recreation activities in organisations represents ever more important area of social responsibility and organisational growth. Organisations of all hue and texture- governmental,private or commercial enterprises-  will need well planned and aligned recreational facilities  to ramp up their productivity.Todays challenging social context increasingly calls on the leadership expertise of these organisations  to address the important  issue  of human  resources ??burnout. Their charge is to contribute to quality of life of the people at their organisations in the dynamic context of new modes of communication, new information, changing demographics, changing attitudes towards work and play, individualism  and  globalisation. A recreation facility is provided in premises or precincts of an organisation,for fun,diversion,enjoyment relaxation,amusement and physical, psychological,  spiritual  or social well being of members of the organisation. Activities engaged in the facility are planned by management with the view to enhance  productivity by looking at  the well  being and  development  of employees. It is inclusive of hiring recreation organisations services.

The steel baron Andrew Carnegie endowed hundreds of public libraries across the country  in the late nineteenth and early twentieth century, explaining, "How a man spends his time at work may be taken for granted but how he spends his hours of recreation is really the key to his  progress  in all  the virtues."  Among the important  literatures,  study  by Sabarirajan, Meharajan  &amp;amp;  Arun. (2010) titled  Positive  correlation  between  welfare  activities  and employee attitude in textile mills, remains prominent beacon of welfare studies on Indian organisations. In this exploratory  research the authors have established the positive influence of various welfare activities practiced in Indian organisations on employee attitudes including employee  productivity.The study has concluded that,generally,  welfare measures are recreational,medical, educational, housing, sanitation and so on. Every organization provides the statutory welfare measures but some organizations provides some more welfare facilities to the employees so that they may retain the employees and by improving their quality of work life.  By the result  of improved quality of work life  among  the employees  their involvement in job gets increased and results in increased productivity of the organization. The organizations maintaining smooth relationship between workers and management, which leads to attainment of organisation goals.

Recreational facilities has received a great deal of interest by human resources management, professionals and organisational behaviour  researchers in Western countries over the years; however, its practice is fairly nascent in Indian   organisations. The organisations in India are facing many diverse and complex  challenges of the growing economy and ever increasing demands of the workplace. Recreational facilities at the place of work play  bigger and a vital role in ensuring  an organisational  sustained  productivity by systematically  building team, leadership and communicative skills. Enhanced and informal contact amongst all employees across hierarchy  enriches and secures retention of cultural, social and intellectual assets, its skill and inventiveness.

This study analysed organisational employees perceptions of Recreational facilities, Recreation activities and Employee contribution as one of the consequences of recreational facilities. 202 employees from 10 organizations            (5 manufacturing  and 5 IT services) were surveyed. The judgemental sampling technique  was adopted to draw the sample. A questionnaire was designed and pilot tested. The reliability of the questionnaire was above .

850 (Cronchbachs Alpha reliability). The major findings of the study were:

1.Statistical analysis and interpretation of data reveal that organisations have provided varying level  of recreational  facilities  to their employees since  the level  of perception  of importance  of  recreational  facilities  varied  considerably.Overall, the perception  of  the facilities was moderate.



2.       Employees  perception  of level  of recreation  activities  provided was  higher than recreational facilities although the perception varied considerably again. Employee perception of recreation facilities was high.

3.The level  of  perception of importance  of  employee  contribution as  a  result of recreational facilities varied considerably in the range. The mean value was considerably high at mean value of 5.89, with standard deviation 1.00.

4.There was significant correlation between the perception of importance of recreational facilities and recreational activities and the level of employee contribution. Thus, the level of employee contribution has been found to be related to each of the perception of importance of recreational facilities and recreational activities.

5.Multiple  linear  regression  of level  of employee  contribution on the independent variables of perception of importance of recreational facilities and perception of importance of recreational  activities  was found to be statistically  significant.  Both of the independent variables were found to have a significant impact on the level of employee contribution, and together explained 60.2% of the overall variation in level of employee contribution.

 6.There were significant differences in the perception of importance of recreational facilities, recreation  activities and the level of employee contribution across  variable demographics.

 The study  empirically  indicates  that employee  contribution made  to  the organisation productivity is strongly linked to recreational facilities provided by the organisation to their employees.In addition,at the same time  it also reveals that the employees  perceive  only moderate  recreational facilities from their organisations.This  means  that the system of recreational facilities and recreation activities in the organisations is yet not formalised and is ad-hoc and haphazard. Organisations should dedicate efforts to increase perception of recreation  among  the employees  by including the aspects  and  goals  of recreation  in the organisational strategy.

</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </elementSet>
  </elementSetContainer>
</item>
