Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Faculty Publications Article Faculty Publications -Articles Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource George, Geo Kuruvila; Kurien, Georgy P.; Natarajan, Ramakrishnan; Nair, Sreerengan V.R. Title A name given to the resource Comparative study of benchmarking models for higher education institutions Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 01-01-2025 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived International Journal of Process Management and Benchmarking;Volume;21;Issue;3;pp.368-400 Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context <a href="https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPMB.2025.149397" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPMB.2025.149397</a> <br /><br /><a href="https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105020737327?origin=resultslist" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105020737327?origin=resultslist</a> Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant George G.K., School of Business and Management, CHRIST University, Bengaluru, India; Kurien G.P., School of Business and Management, CHRIST University, Bengaluru, India; Natarajan R., School of Business and Management, CHRIST University, Bengaluru, India; Nair S.V.R., School of Business and Management, CHRIST University, Bengaluru, India Description An account of the resource Benchmarking is a systematic and ongoing process of assessing an organisations business processes against those of business process leaders to obtain data that will enable the firm to take corrective action to enhance performance (Pattison, 1993). Eight benchmarking models, namely the European Foundation for Quality Management (EFQM) excellence model, American Productivity and Quality Centre (APQC) consortium framework, Commonwealth Higher Education Management Service (CHEMS) model, Mckinnon model, Henderson-Smart et al. model, educational development efficiency (EDE) model, Tee benchmarking model, and fourth generation balanced scorecard method are being studied, analysed, evaluated and compared. While most models effectiveness depends on the cooperation and participation of benchmarking partners, few depends on secondary data are an exception. Most benchmarking models lack the implementation and are fluid and flexible models. This comparative benchmarking study helps an institution understand which benchmarking model needs to be used, as the study details each models essential features, advantages, and limitations. Copyright 2025 Inderscience Enterprises Ltd. Subject The topic of the resource benchmarking; higher education; key performance indicators; KPIs Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Inderscience Publishers Relation A related resource ISSN: 14606739; Language A language of the resource English Type The nature or genre of the resource Article Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Restricted Access; Hardcopy may be available in the library Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource online