Comparative Study of Wi-Fi 6 and 5G for Residential Internet Services
5G; Comparison; Internet; Performance; Residential; Services; Wi-Fi 6
Whereas Wi-Fi 6 and 5G briefly competed in the home internet space, 5G has since outpaced Wi-Fi 6 in speed and reliability. Wi-Fi 6 and 5G have detailed white papers outlining their protocols and specs. Initial home use and advanced Wi-Fi use should prioritize downloading, as Wi-Fi 6 offers a significant edge in download speed, latency, and efficiency in multi-device environments (most homes have a home intelligence system, phones, and PCs). 5G has no physical PC connection and must be provisioned by a carrier and covered by a cell tower. Hence, its advantages are for rural users and for users who typically work from home. Each has specific target markets, with the home as the primary focus, including streaming media and gaming, multiple smart home devices, and a home office. Install speed and cost, system-wide latency (total system, including devices), data retention and privacy, device lock (data retention), and scaling (to be sound). 5G uses cell towers with a large and covered geographic area and no physical restrictions. Each has target markets where advanced Wi-Fi has outpaced rural users and mobile users. This is where Wi-Fi has outpaced 5G (5G is a better solution for streaming, data retention, and scaling). Findings indicate that Wi-Fi 6 is excellent in environments with high-speed broadband. At the same time, 5G demonstrates its advantages in areas with low-quality broadband or when users require mobile Internet access. Because both technologies offer unique benefits, combining them may yield the best home connectivity. The document enables buyers, Internet Service Providers (ISPs), and community decision-makers to choose cutting-edge internet connectivity options. 2025, Innovative Information Science and Technology Research Group. All rights reserved.
Soliev, Erkin; Dhakshayini, K.N.; Abas, Hayder Muhamed; Yomas, Jerrin; Ananthalakshmi, G.; Anvarovna, Abdullayeva Shakhnoza
Journal of Internet Services and Information Security;Volume;15;Issue;4;pp.227-242
Innovative Information Science and Technology Research Group
https://doi.org/10.58346/JISIS.2025.I4.017 https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105036448244?origin=resultslist
Soliev E., Jizzakh State Pedagogical University, Jizzakh, Uzbekistan; Dhakshayini K.N., School of Business & Management, Christ (Deemed to be University), Yeshwanthpur Branch, Bangalore, India; Abas H.M., Department of Computers Techniques Engineering, College of Technical Engineering, The Islamic University, Najaf, Iraq, Department of Computers Techniques Engineering, College of Technical Engineering, The Islamic University of Al Diwaniyah, Al Diwaniyah, Iraq; Yomas J., Department of Electronics and communication engineering, Vimal Jyothi Engineering College, Chemperi, Kearla, Kannur, India; Ananthalakshmi G., Department of Cyber Security, New Prince Shri Bhavani College of Engineering and Technology, Tamil Nadu, Chennai, India; Anvarovna A.S., Faculty of Humanities & Pedagogy, Turan International University, Namangan, Uzbekistan